An Article Deconstruction I often talk about article deconstruction as a useful method for extracting principles for writing journal articles. The following is an article deconstruction of the introduction section of Fujita and Diener The writing principles extracted may be relevant to others writing introductions to journal articles in psychology.
The goal of assigning article reviews is to get the students familiar with the works of the renowned specialists in a particular field. To summarize the article properly, one needs to comprehend the essence of the work, its argument, and its main points.
You are expected to assess the main theme, its supporting arguments, and the perspectives for further research in the given direction. Like any other written piece, an article review requires thorough preparation. Hence, article review writing process consists of two stages: Define an article review You write it not for the general public but for the readership familiar with the field of knowledge.
This review is to summarize the essence of the article, its key arguments, and findings, and the author's attitude towards the subject-matter. You also assess the new knowledge that the author has brought to the discipline and its application potential.
Writing an article review is not just about expressing your opinion on the work.
It is a fully-fledged evaluation of the author's ideas expressed in the article. As you analyze the article, you use your own ideas and research experience. Your overall conclusions about the article base off on your own judgment backed up by your experience in this field and your common sense.
You only talk about the research already performed by the article's author. You do not perform any new research yourself. Plan your work on the review You should know exactly how you will be writing your article review before you even read the article in question.
This is because you should know which points of the article are most important to your review in advance. The article review outline usually goes like this: Summary of the article.
The most important point, facts, and claims Redeeming features. Point out the possible gaps of information, logical inconsistencies, the contradiction of ideas, unanswered questions, etc.
Pass your judgment as to whether the given facts are sufficient for supporting the author's main argument. Read the introduction, the conclusion, the first sentences of each paragraph.
|Language & Lit||Qualitative Article Critique Paper details: Attached are the guidelines to develop the review, plus the article that need to be used Guidelines for Qualitative Nursing Research Critique Analyze and critique a quantitative nursing research article from a nursing research journal published within the past 5 years.|
|Overview of study||Peter Bakke Running Head: Based upon upper echelon and information processing theories, the researchers hypothesized that five CEO characteristics age, tenure, education, international experience, and duality - that is, CEO also as board chairman were significant moderating effects upon international firm performance.|
Then read several opening paragraphs. Only then you should read the whole article. This first reading is only for getting the overall idea of the point that the author sought to make with this article.
If you come across any notions or concepts that you don't fully understand or if any questions arise, make notes. Look up terms you are unfamiliar with, so you can fully understand the article. Read the article in all attention Carefully read the article several more times.
If you are reading it from a screen, use a highlighter for the most meaningful parts. If you are using a print version, use a pen.
The most meaningful parts here are the main points and the facts to support them. Instead, make notes on the margins and draw connections between different parts of the article. Supplement what you read with what you already know about the subject-matter.
This may be either something you have discussed at school or something you have read on your own. Does your existing knowledge support the ideas in the article or contradict them? What previous knowledge does the author refer to?
Point out the similarities the article shares with what you have read on the topic before, as well as the differences. If you come across a section that you do not fully understand, you should not leave it like this.
You can only write a solid article review if you have made sure that you understand everything there is to understand in and about the article. Retell the article to yourself It is best to do it in written form, such as an outline or a piece of free writing.Journal article critique 1. Journal Article Critique Sidawi, B.
(). The tutors’ views on the utilization of e-learning system in architectural education. Article Review Samples Reviewing an article is not as easy as it sounds: it requires a critical mind and doing some extra research.
Check out our article review samples to gain a better understanding of how to review articles yourself. The length of an introduction is usually one paragraph for a journal article review and two or three paragraphs for a longer book review. Include a few opening sentences that announce the author(s) and the title, and briefly explain the topic of the text.
If you are asked to write a critique of a research article, you should focus on these issues. You will If the paper was not published in a peer-reviewed journal, consider the credibility of the Use a standard citation style (e.g., APA, MLA, or Chicago/Turabian) to format references in your critique, and be sure to cite page numbers for.
An article review is a piece of writing where you summarize and assess someone else's article.
The goal of assigning article reviews is to get the students familiar with the works of the renowned specialists in a particular field.
If the review was written to stand alone, as is the case of a term paper or a review article for publication, the conclusion needs to make clear how the material in the body of the review has supported the assertion or proposition presented in the introduction.